Lead like lambs into his hands: Is light entertainment more important than child protection?

The Jimmy Savile abuse story has mushroomed into daily revelations that become increasingly disturbing.  Certainly, what seems now, significant evidence that he was abusing children is in itself abhorrent. What has followed has gone beyond this and becoming truly shocking.

Perhaps it is the fact that Savile appears to have abused children over a number of decades that should shock us.  Or that he molested children in hospital where they were more vulnerable and in need of protection than  normal.  Maybe it was that it seems that there were professionals that knew of his behaviour and instead of protecting the children, looked the other way.  All these issues are, of course, deeply troubling.

What, I would suggest, is perhaps even more troubling is that Jimmy Savile continued to be promoted by national organisations as a significant public figure to, not only advocate for children but also to protect them.  Those of us of a certain age in the UK knew him as synonymous with the Clunk Click advertisements, which promoted seat belt wearing, yet, for instance, he also appeared in a handbook on child minding (see below).  We cannot forget him as the presenter of his most famous program, Jim’ll Fix it, a program about making children’s dreams come true.

Jimmy Savile promoting a child minding publication

All this endorsement of Jimmy Savile as an individual who was safe, kind  and thoughtful of children now comes with the knowledge that he was widely known, especially in media circles, to have been abusing children.  This is perhaps the greatest disgrace.  Not only did people’s inaction cause further suffering to children but that people, in effect, facilitated and sanctioned  his abusive behaviour through peddling these untruths.

There has been much discussion over recent days about the fact that it was a very different time in the 1970s and child protection was perhaps not as clear in the publics mind as it is now.  I will remind people that Jimmy Savile died on 29 October 2011, less than a year ago, with a list of honours – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile#Honours (and I doubt this is an exhaustive list).  The fact that he died so recently, in a time where child protection has been a significant public debate on several occasions, and yet no one stepped forward, should shame those who knew and did nothing.  In this, I certainly do not mean, or blame, the victims.  Instead I turn to the professionals, media and people in positions of influence who, by their own admission knew of his abuse of children.  Those people were content to let him die an exalted man.

Child protection can never be a matter for just professionals but instead must be a concern for the whole community.  Those who see or know about the sexual abuse of children should have little doubt about its destructive outcome and how utterly wrong it is.  Therefore there can be few excuses for allowing it to continue.  There is ALWAYS something you can do.

I am sure we are only at the beginning of a worrying journey concerning this and there have been clues that maybe the light entertainment industry has more questions to answer.  As someone, like many, who grew up with Savile on the BBC, this whole episode has left a bad taste and has significantly tainted my previously high regard for that organisation.  Unfortunately, apologies and independent enquiries may do little to  mend the damage done to many childhood memories and more importantly to the victims of Jimmy Savile who were led like lambs into his hands.

Yet again it appears we must trust in those people and organisations who looked the other way to the sexual abuse of children to investigate their own inaction and apathy.  There seems little we can do.  Or have we heard that before?


5 Comments on “Lead like lambs into his hands: Is light entertainment more important than child protection?”

  1. […] Lead like lambs into his hands: Is light entertainment more important than child protection? […]

  2. This is really interesting I’m hoping to look into this more!

  3. Richard saunders says:

    I’m a child protection social worker, have 26 children on my caseload and 37 hours to protect them. That makes 1.5 hours per week to: travel to child’s home, inspect home, talk to child, talk to parents, observe family, stay in touch with teachers, health pros, police, drugs workers , domestic violence workers, write reports of visits, phone calls, report to case conferences and fully discuss with managers. JUST NOT DO-ABLE! I’ve learnt the lessons of previous child deaths, but society has not learnt the lesson that we must be given resources to do the job.

    • Hello Richard,

      I was just wondering, if you have only 1.5 hours on average to spend on a child’s case, what do you set about achieving in a day?

      In other words what do you prioritise? That is, which types of children, in which types of situation?

      Furthermore if you don’t have time to do everything that social workers are advised they should do, which things do you put off? That is, which types of children, in which types of situation might you put off, or reduce the rigour with which you investigate?

      Be interested to know. I think the more we understand about the limitations of what social workers can achieve, given the caseloads they have, the more we can get at the hear of the issue, which is the level of resource that the state, the government of the day, and the nation as a whole wishes to make available to child protection.


  4. […] Lead like lambs into his hands: Is light entertainment more important than child protection? […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s